apgpАктуальные проблемы государства и праваCurrent Issues of the State and Law2587-93402782-3334Тамбовский государственный университет имени Г.Р. Державинаapgp-918Research ArticleОБЩАЯ ТЕОРИЯ И ИСТОРИЯ ПРАВА И ГОСУДАРСТВАGENERAL THEORY AND HISTORY OF LAW AND THE STATEИДЕЯ СОЦИАЛЬНЫХ ПРАВ ЧЕЛОВЕКА В ТРАКТОВКЕ ПРЕДСТАВИТЕЛЕЙ ШКОЛЫ ВОЗРОЖДЕННОГО ЕСТЕСТВЕННОГО ПРАВА РОССИИ КОНЦА XIX – НАЧАЛА XX В.THE IDEA OF SOCIAL HUMAN RIGHTS AS INTERPRETED BY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE SCHOOL OF REVIVED NATURAL LAW IN RUSSIA AT THE END OF THE 19TH – BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURIEShttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-5344ЛапаеваАнгелина ВячеславовнаLapayevaAngelina Vyacheslavovnaanlapaeva@gmail.comТамбовский государственный университет им. Г.Р. ДержавинаРоссияDerzhavin Tambov State UniversityRussian Federation202023082026416417425Copyright © Лапаева А.В., 20262026Лапаева А.В.Lapayeva A.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://apgp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/918

Проанализированы взгляды представителей школы возрожденного естественного права на проблему социальных прав человека. Констатировано, что ключевой вехой государственно-правовых преобразований России начала XX столетия явилось закрепление за российскими подданными гражданских прав и свобод. Установлено, что представителями школы возрожденного естественного права была разработана теория прав и свобод личности в контексте взаимосвязи правового государства с проблемами этики и морали. Доктринально обосновано, что социальные права, наравне с политическими, занимали важное место в каталоге классификации прав человека, разработанном учеными, ввиду того, что с ними были связаны такие ценности, как социальная справедливость и социальное равенство. Предложены аргументы, указывающие на то, что представители школы возрожденного естественного права считали источником возникновения социальных прав право на достойное человеческое существование, которые являлись предпосылкой к социальному раскрепощению личности и попыткой трансформации сословного общества в гражданское.

We analyze the representatives’ views of the school of revived natural law on the social human rights problem. We note that a key milestone in the state and legal transformations of Russia at the beginning of the 20th century was the consolidation of civil rights and freedoms for Russian citizens. We establish that representatives of the school of revived natural law developed a theory of individual rights and freedoms in the context of the relationship between the constitutional state with the ethics and morality problems. We doctrinally justify that social rights, along with political rights, occupied an important place in the catalog of human rights classification developed by scientists, due to the fact that they were associated with values such as social justice and social equality. We offer arguments indicating that representatives of the school of revived natural law considered the right to a dignified human existence as the source of social rights emergence, which were a prerequisite for the individual’s social emancipation and an attempt to transform the estate society into a civil one.

естественное правошкола возрожденного естественного правачеловекобществоправовое государствогражданское обществосвободаправа человекасоциальные праваправо на достойное человеческое существованиеуровень жизниnatural lawschool of revived natural lawhumansocietyconstitutional statecivil societyfreedomhuman rightssocial rightsright to a dignified human existenceliving standardИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта № 20-011-00252.The study is funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research according to the research project no. 20-011-00252.ReferencesNovgorodtsev P.I. Vvedeniye v filosofiyu prava. Krizis sovremennogo pravosoznaniya [Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. The Crisis of Modern Justice]. St. Petersburg, Lan Publ., 2000, 347 p. (In Russian).Novgorodtsev P.I. Vvedeniye v filosofiyu prava. Krizis sovremennogo pravosoznaniya [Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. The Crisis of Modern Justice]. St. Petersburg, Lan Publ., 2000, 347 p. (In Russian).Novgorodtsev P.I., Pokrovskiy I.A. O prave na sushchestvovaniye [About the Right for Existence]. Moscow, M.O. Wolf Partnership, 1911, 48 p. (In Russian).Novgorodtsev P.I., Pokrovskiy I.A. O prave na sushchestvovaniye [About the Right for Existence]. Moscow, M.O. Wolf Partnership, 1911, 48 p. (In Russian).Novgorodtsev P.I. Pravo na dostoynoye chelovecheskoye sushchestvovaniye [The Right to a Dignified Human Existence]. Moscow, Lan Publ., 1995, 446 p. (In Russian).Novgorodtsev P.I. Pravo na dostoynoye chelovecheskoye sushchestvovaniye [The Right to a Dignified Human Existence]. Moscow, Lan Publ., 1995, 446 p. (In Russian).Tumanova A.S., Kiselev R.V. Prava cheloveka v pravovoy mysli i zakonotvorchestve Rossiyskoy imperii vtoroy poloviny XIX – nachala XX veka [Human Rights in Legal Thought and Lawmaking of the Russian Empire in the Second Half of the 19th – early 20th centuries]. Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2011, 279 p. (In Russian).Tumanova A.S., Kiselev R.V. Prava cheloveka v pravovoy mysli i zakonotvorchestve Rossiyskoy imperii vtoroy poloviny XIX – nachala XX veka [Human Rights in Legal Thought and Lawmaking of the Russian Empire in the Second Half of the 19th – early 20th centuries]. Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2011, 279 p. (In Russian).Lapayeva A.V. Ideya estestvennogo prava v trudakh rossiyskikh konstitutsionalistov kontsa XIX – nachala XX v. [The idea of natural law in the works of Russian constitutionalists of the late 19th - early 20th centuries.]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava – History of State and Law, 2013, no. 5, pp. 30-33. (In Russian).Lapayeva A.V. Ideya estestvennogo prava v trudakh rossiyskikh konstitutsionalistov kontsa XIX – nachala XX v. [The idea of natural law in the works of Russian constitutionalists of the late 19th - early 20th centuries.]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava – History of State and Law, 2013, no. 5, pp. 30-33. (In Russian).Gessen V.M. O pravovom gosudarstve [About the Rule of Law]. St. Petersburg, N. Glagolev Publishing House, 1906, 62 p. (In Russian).Gessen V.M. O pravovom gosudarstve [About the Rule of Law]. St. Petersburg, N. Glagolev Publishing House, 1906, 62 p. (In Russian).Kotlyarevskiy S.A. Vlast’ i pravo. Problema pravovogo gosudarstva [Power and Law: The Issue of the Jural State]. Moscow, Publishing House of G.A. Leman and S.I. Sakharov, 1915, 417 p. (In Russian).Kotlyarevskiy S.A. Vlast’ i pravo. Problema pravovogo gosudarstva [Power and Law: The Issue of the Jural State]. Moscow, Publishing House of G.A. Leman and S.I. Sakharov, 1915, 417 p. (In Russian).Gessen V.M. Osnovy konstitutsionnogo prava [Fundamentals of Constitutional Law]. Petrograd, Publication of the Legal Book Warehouse “Law”, 1917, 439 p. (In Russian)Gessen V.M. Osnovy konstitutsionnogo prava [Fundamentals of Constitutional Law]. Petrograd, Publication of the Legal Book Warehouse “Law”, 1917, 439 p. (In Russian)Gessen V.M. Poddanstvo, ego ustanovleniye i prekrashcheniye [Citizenship, its Establishment and Termination]. St. Peterburg, Publishing and Printing House “Pravda”, 1909, 458 p. (In Russian).Gessen V.M. Poddanstvo, ego ustanovleniye i prekrashcheniye [Citizenship, its Establishment and Termination]. St. Peterburg, Publishing and Printing House “Pravda”, 1909, 458 p. (In Russian).Kistyakovskiy B.A. Pravo kak sotsial’noye yavleniye [Law as a Social Phenomenon]. Moscow, Typolithography of Kushnerev I.N. and Co Partnership, 1911, 17 p. (In Russian).Kistyakovskiy B.A. Pravo kak sotsial’noye yavleniye [Law as a Social Phenomenon]. Moscow, Typolithography of Kushnerev I.N. and Co Partnership, 1911, 17 p. (In Russian).Kistyakovskiy B.A. Sotsial’nyye nauki i pravo. Ocherki po metodologii sotsial’nykh nauk i obshchey teorii prava [Social Sciences and Law. Essays on the Methodology of the Social Sciences and the General Theory of Law]. Moscow, Typolithography of Kushnerev I.N. and Co Partnership, 1916, 708 p. (In Russian).Kistyakovskiy B.A. Sotsial’nyye nauki i pravo. Ocherki po metodologii sotsial’nykh nauk i obshchey teorii prava [Social Sciences and Law. Essays on the Methodology of the Social Sciences and the General Theory of Law]. Moscow, Typolithography of Kushnerev I.N. and Co Partnership, 1916, 708 p. (In Russian).Lapayeva A.V. Pravo na sotsial’noye obespecheniye v rossiyskoy pravovoy mysli kontsa XIX – nachala XX veka [The right to social security in the Russian legal thought from the late XIX to the early XX century]. Grazhdanskoye obshchestvo i pravovoye gosudarstvo – Civil Society in Russia and Abroad, 2020, no. 1, pp. 32-34. (In Russian).Lapayeva A.V. Pravo na sotsial’noye obespecheniye v rossiyskoy pravovoy mysli kontsa XIX – nachala XX veka [The right to social security in the Russian legal thought from the late XIX to the early XX century]. Grazhdanskoye obshchestvo i pravovoye gosudarstvo – Civil Society in Russia and Abroad, 2020, no. 1, pp. 32-34. (In Russian).Moiseyeva O.V. Realizatsiya pravovogo statusa Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v oblasti zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka [Realization of the legal status of the European court of human rights in the field of protection of the rights and freedoms of human]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam 14 Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Sovremennyye voprosy gosudarstva, prava, yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya» [Collection of Scientific Works Based on the Proceedings of the 14th International Research and Practical Conference “Modern Issues of State, Law, Legal Education”]. Tambov, 2019, pp. 325-330. (In Russian).Moiseyeva O.V. Realizatsiya pravovogo statusa Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v oblasti zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka [Realization of the legal status of the European court of human rights in the field of protection of the rights and freedoms of human]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam 14 Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Sovremennyye voprosy gosudarstva, prava, yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya» [Collection of Scientific Works Based on the Proceedings of the 14th International Research and Practical Conference “Modern Issues of State, Law, Legal Education”]. Tambov, 2019, pp. 325-330. (In Russian).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.